Who is better, Amadio or Eklund?
William Eklund leads with a GOAT score of 47.1 against 46.9 for Michael Amadio — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Eklund wins: Dominance, Peak
Amadio wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-michael-amadio-vs-ros-william-eklund
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Eklund leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Amadio | 0 | 0 | 8 | 21 | 58 | 174 |
| 🏳️ Eklund | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 163 | 163 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AmadioActive · Ottawa Senators | EklundActive · Ottawa Senators |
|---|---|---|
| NHL games | 522 | 252 |
| NHL goals | 83 | 50 |
| NHL assists | 91 | 113 |
| NHL points | 174 | 163 |
| NHL award: Stanley Cup | 1 | — |
| Number | 22 | 27 |
| NHL award: E.J. McGuire Award of Excellence | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 41.8 | 46.1 |
| Peak w20% | 57.6 | 66.2 |
| Longevity w20% | 53.8 | 41 |
| Honours w20% | 26 | 26 |
| Statistics w15% | 60 | 59.5 |
William Eklund leads with a GOAT score of 47.1 against 46.9 for Michael Amadio — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Amadio scores higher on statistics, longevity. Eklund leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Amadio: 46.9, Eklund: 47.1.
Make your case for Amadio vs Eklund. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.