Who is better, Wacha or Ray?
Michael Wacha leads with a GOAT score of 64.8 against 64.7 for Robbie Ray — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Wacha wins: Longevity, Honours
Ray wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-michael-wacha-vs-ros-robbie-ray
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wacha leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Wacha | 0 | 0 | 65 | 159 | 584 | 917 |
| 🏳️ Ray | 0 | 0 | 19 | 138 | 739 | 1,570 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WachaActive · Kansas City Royals | RayActive · San Diego Padres |
|---|---|---|
| MLB games | 341 | 298 |
| MLB wins | 120 | 116 |
| MLB strikeouts | 1,570 | 2,082 |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | 1 | — |
| MLB award: Triple-A All-Star Game Top Star, PCL | 1 | — |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| MLB award: NLCS MVP | 1 | — |
| MLB award: NL All-Star | 1 | 2 |
| MLB award: AL All-Star | 1 | — |
| League Championship Series Most Valuable Player Award | 1 | — |
| Major League Baseball All-Star | 1 | 1 |
| Number | 52 | 38 |
| MLB award: CAR Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: AL Cy Young | — | 1 |
| Cy Young Award | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 61.1 | 61.8 |
| Peak w20% | 66.2 | 73.6 |
| Longevity w20% | 69.8 | 66.6 |
| Honours w20% | 56 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 73.9 | 74.6 |
Michael Wacha leads with a GOAT score of 64.8 against 64.7 for Robbie Ray — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ray scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Wacha leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wacha: 64.8, Ray: 64.7.
Make your case for Wacha vs Ray. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.