Who is better, Waseem or Rutherford?
Muhammad Waseem leads with a GOAT score of 60.7 against 59.7 for Sherfane Rutherford — a gap of 1.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Waseem vs Rutherford
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WaseemWinner
60.7Waseem wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Rutherford
59.7Rutherford wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ros-muhammad-waseem-vs-ros-sherfane-rutherford
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🏳️ Muhammad Waseem
60.7
Waseem leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Muhammad Waseem
2. Sherfane Rutherford
Category breakdown
Season form · Centuries per year
Career timeline · Centuries per year
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Centuries per year1. 🏳️ Muhammad Waseem5 years played · career day 1,8254,203 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Sherfane Rutherford5 years played · career day 1,8251,323 runs
-68.5% vs Waseem at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Waseem | 0 | 0 | 108 | 1,119 | 4,203 | 4,203 |
| 🏳️ Rutherford | 0 | 0 | 173 | 364 | 1,323 | 3,470 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WaseemActive · Karachi Kings | RutherfordActive · Mumbai Indians |
|---|---|---|
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | 143 | 184 |
| Runs | 4,203 | 3,470 |
| Wickets | 3 | 10 |
| Player of the match | 13 | 8 |
| Number | 10 | 68 |
| Dominance w25% | 66.1 | 62.4 |
| Peak w20% | 62.2 | 56.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 41 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 63.4 | 60.4 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Waseem60.7
Rutherford59.7
FAQ
Where does Rutherford beat Waseem?
Rutherford scores higher on longevity. Waseem leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Waseem vs Rutherford score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Waseem: 60.7, Rutherford: 59.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Waseem vs Rutherford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.