Who is better, Burns or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 13.3 for Quinton Burns — a gap of 78.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Burns vs Fetisov
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FetisovWinner
92.1Fetisov wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Burns
13.3Burns wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/ros-quinton-burns-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Viacheslav Fetisov
92.1
Fetisov leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Burns — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Viacheslav Fetisov
2. Quinton Burns
Category breakdown
Season form · Points per season
Career timeline · Points per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Points per season1. 🇷🇺 Viacheslav Fetisov5 seasons played · career day 1,825297 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ Quinton Burns0 seasons played0 points
-100.0% vs Fetisov at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Burns | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fetisov92.1
Burns13.3
FAQ
Where does Burns beat Fetisov?
Burns does not lead any of the five categories; Fetisov is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Burns vs Fetisov score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burns: 13.3, Fetisov: 92.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Burns vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.