Who is better, Rosengarten or Baugh?
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 12.7 for Roger Rosengarten — a gap of 79.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sammy Baugh above Roger Rosengarten: 92.3 vs 12.7. Sammy Baugh leads on Honours, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baugh wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Rosengarten wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-roger-rosengarten-vs-sammy-baugh
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baugh leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Rosengarten — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Rosengarten | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 🇺🇸 Baugh | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 695 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RosengartenActive · Baltimore Ravens | BaughRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL games | 17 | — |
| NFL tackles | 1 | — |
| Number | 70 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 2 |
| Passing titles | — | 6 |
| Punting average | — | 45 |
| Career interceptions on defence | — | 31 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 12.3 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 18.1 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 10.3 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 8.3 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 15.5 | 94 |
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 12.7 for Roger Rosengarten — a gap of 79.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rosengarten does not lead any of the five categories; Baugh is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rosengarten: 12.7, Baugh: 92.3.
Make your case for Rosengarten vs Baugh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.