Who is better, Khan or Hammond?
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 13.5 for Sarfaraz Khan — a gap of 79.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wally Hammond above Sarfaraz Khan: 93.0 vs 13.5. Wally Hammond leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hammond wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Khan wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/ros-sarfaraz-khan-vs-wally-hammond
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Khan — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏳️ Khan | 0 | 0 | 111 | 177 | 408 | 585 |
| 🇬🇧 Hammond | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KhanActive · Chennai Super Kings | HammondRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Matches (T20 leagues + internationals) | 56 | — |
| Runs | 956 | — |
| Wickets | 0 | — |
| Number | 97 | — |
| Test runs | — | 7,249 |
| Test batting average | — | 58.45 |
| First-class centuries | — | 167 |
| Test centuries | — | 22 |
| Test wickets | — | 83 |
| Dominance w25% | 13.1 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 18.7 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 11.1 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 9.1 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 16 | 96 |
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 13.5 for Sarfaraz Khan — a gap of 79.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Khan does not lead any of the five categories; Hammond is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Khan: 13.5, Hammond: 93.0.
Make your case for Khan vs Hammond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.