GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Taylor vs Perry

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PerryWinner
88.2

Perry wins: Dominance, Honours

Taylor
88.1

Taylor wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ross-taylor-vs-ellyse-perry

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Ellyse Perry
88.2

Perry leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Seven World Cup titles and the best all-round record in women's cricket.

1. Ellyse Perry
88.2
2. Ross Taylor
88.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Ellyse Perry5 years played · career day 2,921252 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Ross Taylor5 years played · career day 2,190214 runs
-15.1% vs Perry at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇳🇿 Taylor00028158404
🇦🇺 Perry000085314

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricTaylorRetiredPerryActive
World Test Championship titles1
Test runs7,683
ODI runs8,607
International centuries40
ODI matches236
World Cup titles7
International wickets300
International runs7,000
Test double centuries1
ICC Cricketer of the Year2
Ashes series wins6
Dominance w25%8286
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%9288
Honours w20%8288
Statistics w15%9690

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Perry88.2
Taylor88.1
The people
Taylor
Perry

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Taylor vs Perry. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →