Who is better, Crawford or Hooper?
Rusty Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.2 for Tom Hooper — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Rusty Crawford and Tom Hooper level at 80.2. Rusty Crawford leads on Longevity, Statistics. Tom Hooper leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Crawford wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hooper wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/rusty-crawford-vs-tom-hooper
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Crawford leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 39 | 87 |
| 🇨🇦 Hooper | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 373 | 488 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Rusty Crawford leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.2 for Tom Hooper — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hooper scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Crawford leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Crawford: 80.2, Hooper: 80.2.
Make your case for Crawford vs Hooper. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.