Who is better, Pedlow or Sheilla?
Sam Pedlow leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.3 for Sheilla Castro — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sam Pedlow above Sheilla Castro: 76.6 vs 76.3. Sam Pedlow leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Sheilla Castro leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Pedlow wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Sheilla wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/sam-pedlow-bv-vs-sheilla-castro
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Pedlow leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Pedlow | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 304 | 639 |
| 🇧🇷 Sheilla | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 29 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PedlowActive | SheillaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Tour medals | 3 | — |
| Canadian titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 3 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 14 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Grand Prix titles | — | 6 |
| World Cup medals | — | 2 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 74 |
Sam Pedlow leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.3 for Sheilla Castro — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sheilla scores higher on dominance, honours. Pedlow leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Pedlow: 76.6, Sheilla: 76.3.
Make your case for Pedlow vs Sheilla. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.