Who is better, Baugh or Flores?
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 88.8 for Tom Flores — a gap of 3.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sammy Baugh above Tom Flores: 92.3 vs 88.8. Sammy Baugh leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Tom Flores leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baugh wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Flores wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/sammy-baugh-vs-tom-flores
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baugh leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Flores — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Baugh | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 330 | 695 |
| 🇺🇸 Flores | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaughRetired | FloresRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL titles | 2 | — |
| Passing titles | 6 | — |
| Punting average | 45 | — |
| Career interceptions on defence | 31 | — |
| Seasons played | 16 | — |
| Super Bowl titles as coach | — | 2 |
| Super Bowl titles as player or assistant | — | 2 |
| Career coaching wins | — | 97 |
| Conference championships | — | 2 |
| Seasons in the NFL | — | 30 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 90 |
Sammy Baugh leads with a GOAT score of 92.3 against 88.8 for Tom Flores — a gap of 3.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Flores scores higher on longevity. Baugh leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baugh: 92.3, Flores: 88.8.
Make your case for Baugh vs Flores. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.