GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Samsonov vs Li Xiaoxia

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Li XiaoxiaWinner
78.3

Li Xiaoxia wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Samsonov
74.5

Samsonov wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/samsonov-vs-li-xiaoxia

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Li Xiaoxia
78.3

Li Xiaoxia leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Grand Slam winner with Olympic, world and World Cup singles titles.

1. Li Xiaoxia
78.3
2. Vladimir Samsonov
74.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Li Xiaoxia5 seasons played · career day 4,38230 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇾 Vladimir Samsonov5 seasons played · career day 3,28623 titles
-23.3% vs Li Xiaoxia at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇧🇾 Samsonov0000323
🇨🇳 Li Xiaoxia000009

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSamsonovRetiredLi XiaoxiaRetired
World Cup titles31
European Championship singles titles3
World Championship medals2
Olympic appearances6
Best world ranking1
Years at top level30
Olympic golds2
World Championship singles titles2
Grand Slams completed1
World team titles4
Months at No. 112
Dominance w25%6676
Peak w20%7884
Longevity w20%9074
Honours w20%6880
Statistics w15%7278

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Li Xiaoxia78.3
Samsonov74.5
The people
Samsonov
Li Xiaoxia

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Samsonov vs Li Xiaoxia. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →