Who is better, Jayasuriya or Chanderpaul?
Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.3 for Sanath Jayasuriya — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shivnarine Chanderpaul above Sanath Jayasuriya: 89.4 vs 89.3. Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads on Longevity, Statistics. Sanath Jayasuriya leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chanderpaul wins: Longevity, Statistics
Jayasuriya wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/sanath-jayasuriya-vs-shivnarine-chanderpaul
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chanderpaul leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇰 Jayasuriya | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 105 | 317 |
| 🇬🇾 Chanderpaul | 0 | 0 | 35 | 74 | 218 | 472 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JayasuriyaRetired | ChanderpaulRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ODI runs | 13,430 | 8,778 |
| ODI wickets | 323 | — |
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Test runs | 6,973 | 11,867 |
| Fastest ODI fifty (balls) | 17 | — |
| Tests played | — | 164 |
| Test centuries | — | 30 |
| Batting average | — | 51 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 96 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteShivnarine Chanderpaul leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.3 for Sanath Jayasuriya — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jayasuriya scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Chanderpaul leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jayasuriya: 89.3, Chanderpaul: 89.4.
Make your case for Jayasuriya vs Chanderpaul. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.