Who is better, Richards-Ross or Banks?
Willie Banks leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.5 for Sanya Richards-Ross — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willie Banks above Sanya Richards-Ross: 87.7 vs 87.5. Willie Banks leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Sanya Richards-Ross leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Banks wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Richards-Ross wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/sanya-richards-ross-vs-willie-banks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Banks leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Richards-Ross | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 147.51 | 345.4 |
| 🇺🇸 Banks | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 281 | 639 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Richards-RossRetired | BanksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 5 | — |
| World Championship golds | 5 | — |
| 400m best (sec) | 48.7 | — |
| Diamond League titles | 4 | — |
| World Championship medals | 8 | 1 |
| World records set | — | 1 |
| World record in centimetres | — | 1,797 |
| US titles | — | 6 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Willie Banks leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.5 for Sanya Richards-Ross — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richards-Ross scores higher on honours. Banks leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Richards-Ross: 87.5, Banks: 87.7.
Make your case for Richards-Ross vs Banks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.