GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Saqlain vs Mandhana

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SaqlainWinner
84.8

Saqlain wins: Peak

Mandhana
84.8

Mandhana wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/saqlain-mushtaq-vs-smriti-mandhana

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Saqlain Mushtaq
84.8

Saqlain leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Inventor of the doosra and the fastest bowler to 100 ODI wickets.

1. Saqlain Mushtaq
84.8
2. Smriti Mandhana
84.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Saqlain Mushtaq5 years played · career day 2,190228 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 Smriti Mandhana5 years played · career day 2,190228 runs
0.0% vs Saqlain at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Saqlain00020180328
🇮🇳 Mandhana00030168400

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSaqlainRetiredMandhanaActive
Test wickets208
ODI wickets288
Fastest to 100 ODI wickets (matches)53
Five-wicket hauls13
Tests played49
ODI runs4,000
ODI centuries10
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards2
T20I runs3,500
Career-high ODI ranking1
Dominance w25%8484
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7676
Honours w20%8082
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Saqlain84.8
Mandhana84.8
The people
Saqlain
Mandhana

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Saqlain vs Mandhana. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →