Who is better, Grahn or Hooper?
Tom Hooper leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.1 for Sara Grahn — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tom Hooper above Sara Grahn: 80.2 vs 80.1. Tom Hooper leads on Honours, Dominance. Sara Grahn leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hooper wins: Dominance, Honours
Grahn wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/sara-grahn-vs-tom-hooper
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hooper leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Grahn | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 70 |
| 🇨🇦 Hooper | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 373 | 488 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Tom Hooper leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.1 for Sara Grahn — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Grahn scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hooper leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Grahn: 80.1, Hooper: 80.2.
Make your case for Grahn vs Hooper. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.