GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Taylor vs Laker

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
TaylorWinner
89.6

Taylor wins: Longevity, Honours

Laker
89.6

Laker wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/sarah-taylor-vs-jim-laker

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Sarah Taylor
89.6

Taylor leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Widely regarded as the finest wicketkeeper in women's cricket history.

1. Sarah Taylor
89.6
2. Jim Laker
89.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Sarah Taylor5 years played · career day 1,825188 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jim Laker5 years played · career day 2,55686 runs
-54.3% vs Taylor at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Taylor002658188408
🇬🇧 Laker000042146

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricTaylorRetiredLakerRetired
World Cup titles2
T20 World Cup titles1
ODI dismissals135
ODI runs4,056
ODI centuries7
Wickets in the 1956 Old Trafford Test19
Test wickets193
Test bowling average21.24
First-class wickets1,944
Ashes series won4
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%94100
Longevity w20%8682
Honours w20%9084
Statistics w15%9496

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Taylor89.6
Laker89.6
The people
Taylor
Laker

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Taylor vs Laker. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →