AthletesTeams
sccc vs CadiaN
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
scccWinner
79.2sccc wins: Honours
CadiaN
79.2CadiaN wins: Peak, Statistics
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 sccc
79.2
sccc leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Major finalist mid laner and a premier tournament winner in China.
1. sccc
2. CadiaN
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇨🇳 sccc5 split years played · career day 1,826364 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇩🇰 CadiaN5 split years played · career day 1,825324 trophies
-11.0% vs sccc at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 sccc | 0 | 0 | 50 | 113 | 278 | 678 |
| 🇩🇰 CadiaN | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 324 | 656 |
Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.
| Metric | scccActive | CadiaNActive |
|---|---|---|
| Premier tournament wins | 3 | — |
| Major finals | 2 | — |
| TI appearances | 4 | — |
| Career seasons | 10 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | — | 2 |
| Big event titles | — | 5 |
| Major playoff runs | — | 3 |
| Years at tier-one level | — | 10 |
| Big event MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 85 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
sccc79.2
CadiaN79.2
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for sccc vs CadiaN. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.