Who is better, Davidson or O'Ree?
Willie O'Ree leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 71.9 for Scotty Davidson — a gap of 4.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willie O'Ree above Scotty Davidson: 76.2 vs 71.9. Willie O'Ree leads on Longevity, Honours. Scotty Davidson leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →O'Ree wins: Longevity, Honours
Davidson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/scotty-davidson-vs-willie-oree
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
O'Ree leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Davidson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 42 | 42 |
| 🇨🇦 O'Ree | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 156 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DavidsonRetired | O'ReeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 1 | — |
| NHA goals | 42 | — |
| Seasons played | 2 | — |
| Games played | 44 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| NHL games played | — | 45 |
| Professional seasons | — | 21 |
| WHL scoring titles | — | 2 |
| Hockey Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Career professional goals | — | 328 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 64 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 46 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 76 |
Willie O'Ree leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 71.9 for Scotty Davidson — a gap of 4.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Davidson scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. O'Ree leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Davidson: 71.9, O'Ree: 76.2.
Make your case for Davidson vs O'Ree. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.