Who is better, Coe or Lebedeva?
Sebastian Coe leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Tatyana Lebedeva — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Coe vs Lebedeva
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Sebastian Coe and Tatyana Lebedeva level at 87.5. Sebastian Coe leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Tatyana Lebedeva leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CoeWinner
87.5Coe wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Lebedeva
87.5Lebedeva wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to AthleticsShareable URL · /compare/sebastian-coe-vs-tatyana-lebedeva
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Sebastian Coe
87.5
Coe leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Sebastian Coe
2. Tatyana Lebedeva
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Sebastian Coe5 seasons played · career day 3,286512.3 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Tatyana Lebedeva5 seasons played · career day 1,82511 major golds
-97.9% vs Coe at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Coe | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 101.73 | 512.26 |
| 🇷🇺 Lebedeva | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 21 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CoeRetired | LebedevaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| World records | 12 | — |
| 800 m best (s) | 101.73 | — |
| 1500 m best (s) | 212.18 | — |
| European golds | 2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship golds | — | 3 |
| World indoor titles | — | 4 |
| Best triple jump in metres | — | 15.34 |
| Best long jump in metres | — | 7.33 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Coe87.5
Lebedeva87.5
FAQ
Where does Lebedeva beat Coe?
Lebedeva scores higher on longevity. Coe leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Coe vs Lebedeva score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Coe: 87.5, Lebedeva: 87.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Coe vs Lebedeva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.