Who is better, Fedorov or Horton?
Sergei Fedorov leads with a GOAT score of 84.9 against 84.9 for Tim Horton — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Fedorov vs Horton
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Sergei Fedorov and Tim Horton level at 84.9. Sergei Fedorov leads on Dominance, Statistics. Tim Horton leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FedorovWinner
84.9Fedorov wins: Dominance, Statistics
Horton
84.9Horton wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/sergei-fedorov-vs-tim-horton
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇺 Sergei Fedorov
84.9
Fedorov leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Sergei Fedorov
2. Tim Horton
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇷🇺 Sergei Fedorov5 seasons played · career day 3,286422 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Tim Horton5 seasons played · career day 1,825263 points
-37.7% vs Fedorov at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Fedorov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 79 | 422 |
| 🇨🇦 Horton | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 263 | 541 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fedorov84.9
Horton84.9
FAQ
Where does Horton beat Fedorov?
Horton scores higher on longevity. Fedorov leads on dominance, statistics.
How is the Fedorov vs Horton score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fedorov: 84.9, Horton: 84.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fedorov vs Horton. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.