Who is better, Makarov or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 91.6 for Sergei Makarov — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Viacheslav Fetisov above Sergei Makarov: 92.1 vs 91.6. Viacheslav Fetisov leads on Longevity, Honours. Sergei Makarov leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fetisov wins: Longevity, Honours
Makarov wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/sergei-makarov-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fetisov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Makarov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 412 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MakarovRetired | FetisovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 8 | — |
| Soviet league titles | 11 | 13 |
| Soviet player of the year awards | 3 | — |
| NHL points | 384 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| World Championship titles | — | 7 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Golden Stick awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 91.6 for Sergei Makarov — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Makarov scores higher on dominance, statistics. Fetisov leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Makarov: 91.6, Fetisov: 92.1.
Make your case for Makarov vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.