GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Ismail vs Imran

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
IsmailWinner
88.0

Ismail wins: Peak, Statistics

Imran
87.9

Imran wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/shabnim-ismail-vs-imran-khan

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇿🇦 Shabnim Ismail
88.0

Ismail leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. The fastest recorded bowler in women's cricket and South Africa's leading wicket-taker.

1. Shabnim Ismail
88.0
2. Imran Khan
87.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇵🇰 Imran Khan5 years played · career day 3,652205 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Shabnim Ismail5 years played · career day 1,82588 runs
-57.1% vs Imran at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇿🇦 Ismail0082288216
🇵🇰 Imran00000153

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricIsmailRetiredImranRetired
ODI wickets191
T20I wickets97
Fastest recorded delivery (km/h)132.1
ODI matches127
Career best ODI bowling ranking1
World Cups1
Test wickets362
Test runs3,807
Test bowling average22.81
Five-wicket hauls23
Test wins as captain14
Dominance w25%8686
Peak w20%9490
Longevity w20%8688
Honours w20%8288
Statistics w15%9488

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Ismail88.0
Imran87.9
The people
Ismail
Imran

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Ismail vs Imran. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →