GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Shaheen vs Stokes

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
StokesWinner
84.2

Stokes wins: Longevity, Honours

Shaheen
84.0

Shaheen wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/shaheen-afridi-vs-ben-stokes

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Ben Stokes
84.2

Stokes leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Won England a World Cup final and Headingley 2019 almost alone.

1. Ben Stokes
84.2
2. Shaheen Shah Afridi
84.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Ben Stokes5 years played · career day 2,921270 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Shaheen Shah Afridi5 years played · career day 2,190236 runs
-12.6% vs Stokes at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Shaheen00028180386
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Stokes000095330

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricShaheenActiveStokesActive
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards1
Test wickets120200
ODI wickets130
T20I wickets100
Champions Trophy titles1
World Cups1
World T20 titles1
Test runs6,500
ICC Cricketer of the Year1
Test centuries13
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9492
Longevity w20%7278
Honours w20%8084
Statistics w15%9286

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Stokes84.2
Shaheen84.0
The people
Shaheen
Stokes

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Shaheen vs Stokes. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →