GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Shaheen vs Root

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ShaheenWinner
84.0

Shaheen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Root
83.9

Root wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/shaheen-afridi-vs-joe-root

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇰 Shaheen Shah Afridi
84.0

Shaheen leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. ICC Cricketer of the Year in 2021 and Pakistan's spearhead with the new ball.

1. Shaheen Shah Afridi
84.0
2. Joe Root
83.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Joe Root5 years played · career day 1,8265,063 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Shaheen Shah Afridi5 years played · career day 2,190236 runs
-95.3% vs Root at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇵🇰 Shaheen00028180386
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Root001861,1233,5869,511

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricShaheenActiveRootActive
ICC Cricketer of the Year awards1
Test wickets120
ODI wickets130
T20I wickets100
Champions Trophy titles1
Test runs13,000
Test centuries37
Test matches155
ODI runs6,500
Test batting average50.8
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9488
Longevity w20%7284
Honours w20%8076
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Shaheen84.0
Root83.9
The people
Shaheen
Root

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Shaheen vs Root. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →