Who is better, Afridi or Attewell?
William Attewell leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.6 for Shahid Afridi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks William Attewell above Shahid Afridi: 86.7 vs 86.6. William Attewell leads on Dominance, Statistics. Shahid Afridi leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Attewell wins: Dominance, Statistics
Afridi wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/shahid-afridi-vs-william-attewell
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Attewell leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Afridi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 148 | 314 |
| 🇬🇧 Attewell | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 275 | 585 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AfridiRetired | AttewellRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ODI wickets | 395 | — |
| ODI runs | 8,064 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Fastest ODI century (balls) | 37 | — |
| ODI sixes | 351 | — |
| First-class wickets | — | 1,951 |
| First-class average | — | 15 |
| Test wickets | — | 28 |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | — | 10 |
| Tests played | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
William Attewell leads with a GOAT score of 86.7 against 86.6 for Shahid Afridi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Afridi scores higher on peak, longevity. Attewell leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Afridi: 86.6, Attewell: 86.7.
Make your case for Afridi vs Attewell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.