Who is better, Van Rouwendaal or Zhang?
Zhang Yufei leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Sharon van Rouwendaal — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Zhang Yufei above Sharon van Rouwendaal: 85.0 vs 84.9. Zhang Yufei leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours. Sharon van Rouwendaal leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Zhang wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Van Rouwendaal wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/sharon-van-rouwendaal-vs-zhang-yufei
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Zhang leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Van Rouwendaal | 0 | 0 | 60 | 128 | 290 | 722 |
| 🇨🇳 Zhang | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 346 | 708 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Van RouwendaalActive | ZhangActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | 2 |
| Olympic medals | 3 | 10 |
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| European Championship golds | 10 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 4 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Asian Games golds | — | 10 |
| Olympic records | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 86 |
Zhang Yufei leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Sharon van Rouwendaal — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Van Rouwendaal scores higher on dominance, longevity. Zhang leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Van Rouwendaal: 84.9, Zhang: 85.0.
Make your case for Van Rouwendaal vs Zhang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.