Who is better, Miller-Uibo or Banks?
Shaunae Miller-Uibo leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.7 for Willie Banks — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shaunae Miller-Uibo above Willie Banks: 87.9 vs 87.7. Shaunae Miller-Uibo leads on Honours, Dominance. Willie Banks leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Miller-Uibo wins: Dominance, Honours
Banks wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/shaunae-miller-uibo-vs-willie-banks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Miller-Uibo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇸 Miller-Uibo | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 20 |
| 🇺🇸 Banks | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 281 | 639 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Miller-UiboActive | BanksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| 400 m personal best | 48.36 | — |
| Diamond League titles | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | 1 |
| World records set | — | 1 |
| World record in centimetres | — | 1,797 |
| US titles | — | 6 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Shaunae Miller-Uibo leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.7 for Willie Banks — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Banks scores higher on statistics, longevity. Miller-Uibo leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Miller-Uibo: 87.9, Banks: 87.7.
Make your case for Miller-Uibo vs Banks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.