GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Maruyama vs Geiberger

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MaruyamaWinner
83.0

Maruyama wins: Dominance, Statistics

Geiberger
83.0

Geiberger wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/shigeki-maruyama-vs-al-geiberger

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama
83.0

Maruyama leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Three-time PGA Tour winner who shot 58 in US Open qualifying.

1. Shigeki Maruyama
83.0
2. Al Geiberger
83.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama5 seasons played · career day 2,191132 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Al Geiberger5 seasons played · career day 2,9216 wins
-95.5% vs Maruyama at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Maruyama0004094174
🇺🇸 Geiberger000027

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMaruyamaRetiredGeibergerRetired
PGA Tour wins311
Japan Golf Tour wins10
Presidents Cup appearances3
Lowest competitive round58
Highest world ranking9
Major titles1
Champions Tour wins10
Lowest round59
Ryder Cup appearances2
Dominance w25%7874
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%8690
Honours w20%7476
Statistics w15%9086

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Maruyama83.0
Geiberger83.0
The people
Maruyama
Geiberger

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Maruyama vs Geiberger. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →