GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Maruyama vs Archer

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MaruyamaWinner
83.0

Maruyama wins: Dominance, Statistics

Archer
83.0

Archer wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Golf

Shareable URL · /compare/shigeki-maruyama-vs-george-archer

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama
83.0

Maruyama leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Three-time PGA Tour winner who shot 58 in US Open qualifying.

1. Shigeki Maruyama
83.0
2. George Archer
83.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Wins per season

Career timeline · Wins per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Wins per season
1. 🇯🇵 Shigeki Maruyama5 seasons played · career day 2,191132 wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 George Archer5 seasons played · career day 2,1917 wins
-94.7% vs Maruyama at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Maruyama0004094174
🇺🇸 Archer0001410

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMaruyamaRetiredArcherRetired
PGA Tour wins313
Japan Golf Tour wins10
Presidents Cup appearances3
Lowest competitive round58
Highest world ranking9
Major championships1
Senior Tour wins19
Masters titles1
Seasons on tour35
Dominance w25%7874
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8690
Honours w20%7478
Statistics w15%9086

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Maruyama83.0
Archer83.0
The people
Maruyama
Archer

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Maruyama vs Archer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →