GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Chanderpaul vs Wilson

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ChanderpaulWinner
89.4

Chanderpaul wins: Longevity

Wilson
89.4

Wilson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/shivnarine-chanderpaul-vs-betty-wilson

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇾 Shivnarine Chanderpaul
89.4

Chanderpaul leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Batted through two decades of West Indies cricket for 11,867 Test runs.

1. Shivnarine Chanderpaul
89.4
2. Betty Wilson
89.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Betty Wilson5 years played · career day 2,191293 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇾 Shivnarine Chanderpaul5 years played · career day 1,825218 runs
-25.6% vs Wilson at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇾 Chanderpaul003574218472
🇦🇺 Wilson00040227445

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricChanderpaulRetiredWilsonRetired
Test runs11,867862
Tests played16411
Test centuries30
Batting average51
ODI runs8,778
Test batting average57.46
Test bowling average11.8
Test wickets68
Dominance w25%8492
Peak w20%9298
Longevity w20%9676
Honours w20%8286
Statistics w15%9696

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Chanderpaul89.4
Wilson89.4
The people
Chanderpaul
Wilson

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Chanderpaul vs Wilson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →