Who is better, ShowMaker or Xyp9x?
Heo "ShowMaker" Su leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 75.9 for Andreas "Xyp9x" Højsleth — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Heo "ShowMaker" Su above Andreas "Xyp9x" Højsleth: 76.2 vs 75.9. Heo "ShowMaker" Su leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. Andreas "Xyp9x" Højsleth leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →ShowMaker wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Xyp9x wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/showmaker-vs-xyp9x
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
ShowMaker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 ShowMaker | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 28 | 44 |
| 🇩🇰 Xyp9x | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.02 | 7.19 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShowMakerActive | Xyp9xRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Worlds titles | 1 | — |
| LCK titles | 4 | — |
| Worlds appearances | 6 | — |
| LCK MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 1,000,000 | 1,700,000 |
| Years at tier-1 level | 8 | — |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 28 |
| Top-20 appearances | — | 4 |
| Intel Grand Slams | — | 1 |
| Clutches won | — | 700 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 72 |
Heo "ShowMaker" Su leads with a GOAT score of 76.2 against 75.9 for Andreas "Xyp9x" Højsleth — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Xyp9x scores higher on honours, longevity. ShowMaker leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. ShowMaker: 76.2, Xyp9x: 75.9.
Make your case for ShowMaker vs Xyp9x. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.