GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Wood vs Makarova

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WoodWinner
83.4

Wood wins: Dominance, Peak

Makarova
83.4

Makarova wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/sidney-wood-vs-ekaterina-makarova

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Sidney Wood
83.4

Wood leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Won Wimbledon in 1931 at the age of nineteen.

1. Sidney Wood
83.4
2. Ekaterina Makarova
83.4

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Sidney Wood5 seasons played · career day 1,825375 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇷🇺 Ekaterina Makarova5 seasons played · career day 2,921224 titles
-40.3% vs Wood at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Wood0055120375715
🇷🇺 Makarova0000130248

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWoodRetiredMakarovaRetired
Grand Slam singles titles1
Age at Wimbledon title19
Davis Cup ties7
Seasons played19
US semi-finals2
Grand Slam doubles titles4
Olympic golds1
WTA singles titles3
Career high singles ranking8
Grand Slam singles semi-finals2
Dominance w25%8076
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%8284
Honours w20%8284
Statistics w15%8488

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wood83.4
Makarova83.4
The people
Wood
Makarova

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Wood vs Makarova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →