Who is better, Sinner or Schroeder?
Ted Schroeder leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Jannik Sinner — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ted Schroeder above Jannik Sinner: 83.1 vs 83.0. Ted Schroeder leads on Longevity, Honours. Jannik Sinner leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Schroeder wins: Longevity, Honours
Sinner wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/sinner-vs-ted-schroeder
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Schroeder leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Sinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 22 |
| 🇺🇸 Schroeder | 0 | 0 | 35 | 78 | 252 | 590 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SinnerActive | SchroederRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 4 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 60 | — |
| Career titles | 22 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 5 | — |
| Tour Finals titles | 2 | — |
| Davis Cups | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 2 |
| Davis Cup titles | — | 5 |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| US Championships | — | 1 |
| Davis Cup singles wins | — | 13 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 82 |
Ted Schroeder leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Jannik Sinner — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sinner scores higher on dominance, statistics. Schroeder leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sinner: 83.0, Schroeder: 83.1.
Make your case for Sinner vs Schroeder. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.