Who is better, Sinner or Kafelnikov?
Jannik Sinner leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Yevgeny Kafelnikov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Jannik Sinner and Yevgeny Kafelnikov level at 83.0. Jannik Sinner leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Yevgeny Kafelnikov leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sinner wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Kafelnikov wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/sinner-vs-yevgeny-kafelnikov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sinner leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Sinner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 22 |
| 🇷🇺 Kafelnikov | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 260 | 682 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SinnerActive | KafelnikovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 4 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 60 | — |
| Career titles | 22 | — |
| Masters 1000 titles | 5 | — |
| Tour Finals titles | 2 | — |
| Davis Cups | 2 | — |
| Major singles titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Major doubles titles | — | 4 |
| Career singles titles | — | 26 |
| Weeks at world number one | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Jannik Sinner leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 83.0 for Yevgeny Kafelnikov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kafelnikov scores higher on honours, longevity. Sinner leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sinner: 83.0, Kafelnikov: 83.0.
Make your case for Sinner vs Kafelnikov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.