Who is better, Stephens or Ruzici?
Virginia Ruzici leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Sloane Stephens — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Stephens vs Ruzici
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Virginia Ruzici above Sloane Stephens: 79.9 vs 79.8. Virginia Ruzici leads on Dominance. Sloane Stephens leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RuziciWinner
79.9Ruzici wins: Dominance
Stephens
79.8Stephens wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to TennisShareable URL · /compare/sloane-stephens-vs-virginia-ruzici
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇷🇴 Virginia Ruzici
79.9
Ruzici leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Virginia Ruzici
2. Sloane Stephens
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇷🇴 Virginia Ruzici5 seasons played · career day 2,19112 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Sloane Stephens5 seasons played · career day 2,9216 titles
-50.0% vs Ruzici at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Stephens | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 |
| 🇷🇴 Ruzici | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ruzici79.9
Stephens79.8
FAQ
Where does Stephens beat Ruzici?
Stephens scores higher on longevity. Ruzici leads on dominance.
How is the Stephens vs Ruzici score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Stephens: 79.8, Ruzici: 79.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Stephens vs Ruzici. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.