AthletesTeams
Snax vs Wolf
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WolfWinner
82.3Wolf wins: Honours
Snax
82.2Snax wins: Longevity, Statistics
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Lee "Wolf" Jae-wan
82.3
Wolf leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Two-time world champion support for SK Telecom T1.
1. Lee "Wolf" Jae-wan
2. Snax
Category breakdown
Season form · Trophies per season
Career timeline · Trophies per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Trophies per season1. 🇰🇷 Lee "Wolf" Jae-wan5 split years played · career day 1,825418 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇱 Snax5 split years played · career day 1,826396 trophies
-5.3% vs Wolf at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Snax | 0 | 0 | 58 | 134 | 312 | 666 |
| 🇰🇷 Wolf | 0 | 0 | 66 | 158 | 418 | 482 |
Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.
| Metric | SnaxRetired | WolfRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Major MVP awards | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 4 | — |
| Big event titles | 14 | — |
| Big event MVP awards | 4 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| LCK titles | — | 4 |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | — | 2 |
| World finals | — | 3 |
| Professional seasons | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Wolf82.3
Snax82.2
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Snax vs Wolf. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.