Who is better, Mikita or Blake?
Toe Blake leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Stan Mikita — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mikita vs Blake
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Toe Blake above Stan Mikita: 87.6 vs 87.5. Toe Blake leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Stan Mikita leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BlakeWinner
87.6Blake wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Mikita
87.5Mikita wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/stan-mikita-vs-toe-blake
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Toe Blake
87.6
Blake leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Toe Blake
2. Stan Mikita
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Stan Mikita5 seasons played · career day 2,190308 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Toe Blake5 seasons played · career day 2,190133 points
-56.8% vs Mikita at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Mikita | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 219 | 570 |
| 🇨🇦 Blake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 94 | 272 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Blake87.6
Mikita87.5
FAQ
Where does Mikita beat Blake?
Mikita scores higher on statistics, longevity. Blake leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Mikita vs Blake score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mikita: 87.5, Blake: 87.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mikita vs Blake. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.