GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Smith vs Hartley

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HartleyWinner
81.6

Hartley wins: Peak, Statistics

Smith
81.5

Smith wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/stan-smith-vs-john-hartley

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 John Hartley
81.6

Hartley leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. The only clergyman to win Wimbledon, taking the title in 1879 and 1880.

1. John Hartley
81.6
2. Stan Smith
81.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇺🇸 Stan Smith5 seasons played · career day 1,826358 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 John Hartley5 seasons played · career day 1,82514 titles
-96.1% vs Smith at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Smith0048108263688
🇬🇧 Hartley00451435

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSmithRetiredHartleyRetired
Major singles titles2
Major doubles titles5
Davis Cup titles7
Career singles titles39
Year-end world number one1
Wimbledon titles2
Wimbledon finals3
Consecutive titles2
Career years13
Wimbledon appearances6
Dominance w25%7878
Peak w20%9092
Longevity w20%7874
Honours w20%8280
Statistics w15%8086

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Hartley81.6
Smith81.5
The people
Smith
Hartley

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Smith vs Hartley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →