Who is better, Dineykin or Akhaminova?
Yelena Akhaminova leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Stanislav Dineykin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yelena Akhaminova above Stanislav Dineykin: 85.0 vs 84.9. Yelena Akhaminova leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Stanislav Dineykin leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Akhaminova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Dineykin wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/stanislav-dineykin-vs-yelena-akhaminova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Akhaminova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Dineykin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 53 |
| 🇷🇺 Akhaminova | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 373 | 676 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DineykinRetired | AkhaminovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World League titles | 3 | — |
| European titles | 1 | 2 |
| Olympic Games | 3 | — |
| Seasons played | 19 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 2 |
| World Cup medals | — | 1 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Yelena Akhaminova leads with a GOAT score of 85.0 against 84.9 for Stanislav Dineykin — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Dineykin scores higher on longevity. Akhaminova leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dineykin: 84.9, Akhaminova: 85.0.
Make your case for Dineykin vs Akhaminova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.