GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Harvey vs Bin

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HarveyWinner
87.3

Harvey wins: Longevity

Bin
87.1

Bin wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Esports

Shareable URL · /compare/stephanie-harvey-cs-vs-es-bin

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Stephanie Harvey
87.3

Harvey leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Five-time women's world champion and a leading advocate for esports.

1. Stephanie Harvey
87.3
2. Chen "Bin" Zebin
87.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Trophies per season

Career timeline · Trophies per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through split year 5 · Trophies per season
1. 🇨🇳 Chen "Bin" Zebin5 split years played · career day 1,825359 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Stephanie Harvey5 split years played · career day 1,825332 trophies
-7.5% vs Bin at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Harvey0055116332688
🇨🇳 Bin0055118359729

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 split years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHarveyRetiredBinActive
Women's world championships5
ESWC titles5
Premier tournament wins15
Seasons active14
Team captaincies4
World Championship titles1
World Championship finals3
LPL titles2
Seasons played8
Finals MVP awards1
Dominance w25%8688
Peak w20%9294
Longevity w20%8676
Honours w20%8888
Statistics w15%8490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Harvey87.3
Bin87.1
The people
Harvey
Bin

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Harvey vs Bin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →