GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Rice vs Carlin

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RiceWinner
80.3

Rice wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Carlin
80.3

Carlin wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/stephanie-rice-vs-jazmin-carlin

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Stephanie Rice
80.3

Rice leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Triple Olympic champion in Beijing 2008 with world records in both medley events.

1. Stephanie Rice
80.3
2. Jazmin Carlin
80.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇦🇺 Stephanie Rice5 seasons played · career day 1,825420 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jazmin Carlin5 seasons played · career day 2,55623 major golds
-94.5% vs Rice at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Rice0070154420616
🇬🇧 Carlin00001238

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricRiceRetiredCarlinRetired
Olympic gold medals3
World records set2
Commonwealth Games golds3
World Championship medals31
Olympic Games contested2
Olympic medals2
European titles2
Commonwealth medals2
British records3
Dominance w25%8074
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%6678
Honours w20%8278
Statistics w15%8284

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Rice80.3
Carlin80.3
The people
Rice
Carlin

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Rice vs Carlin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →