Who is better, Nash or McGrady?
Tracy McGrady leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Steve Nash — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tracy McGrady above Steve Nash: 84.8 vs 84.7. Tracy McGrady leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Steve Nash leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McGrady wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Nash wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/steve-nash-vs-tracy-mcgrady
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McGrady leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Nash | 0 | 0 | 2.1 | 5.5 | 15.9 | 58.5 |
| 🇺🇸 McGrady | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 314 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Tracy McGrady leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for Steve Nash — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Nash scores higher on longevity. McGrady leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Nash: 84.7, McGrady: 84.8.
Make your case for Nash vs McGrady. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.