GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Smith vs de Villiers

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SmithWinner
85.6

Smith wins: Dominance, Honours

de Villiers
84.7

de Villiers wins: no category outright

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/steve-smith-vs-ab-de-villiers

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Steve Smith
85.6

Smith leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories. The highest Test batting rating since Bradman and 36 Test hundreds.

1. Steve Smith
85.6
2. AB de Villiers
84.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Steve Smith5 years played · career day 3,652336 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 AB de Villiers5 years played · career day 2,191248 runs
-26.2% vs Smith at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Smith00000270
🇿🇦 de Villiers00040135435

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSmithActivede VilliersRetired
Test runs10,0008,765
Test centuries3622
Test average56
World Test Championships1
World Cups1
ICC Cricketer of the Year2
ODI runs9,577
ODI average53.5
Fastest ODI century (balls)31
ICC Player of the Year1
Dominance w25%8482
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%8282
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Smith85.6
de Villiers84.7
The people
Smith
de Villiers

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Smith vs de Villiers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →