Who is better, Robinson or Fury?
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 80.3 for Tyson Fury — a gap of 14.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sugar Ray Robinson above Tyson Fury: 94.3 vs 80.3. Sugar Ray Robinson leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Fury wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/sugar-ray-robinson-vs-tyson-fury
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 74 |
| 🇬🇧 Fury | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | FuryActive |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 174 | — |
| Knockouts | 109 | — |
| Unbeaten run | 91 | — |
| Middleweight titles | 5 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 2 | — |
| Professional wins | — | 34 |
| Wins by knockout | — | 24 |
| Career losses | — | 2 |
| World title fights | — | 12 |
| Lineal titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 82 |
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 80.3 for Tyson Fury — a gap of 14.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fury does not lead any of the five categories; Robinson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 94.3, Fury: 80.3.
Make your case for Robinson vs Fury. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.