Who is better, Robinson or Gómez?
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 89.5 for Wilfredo Gómez — a gap of 4.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sugar Ray Robinson above Wilfredo Gómez: 94.3 vs 89.5. Sugar Ray Robinson leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Gómez wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/sugar-ray-robinson-vs-wilfredo-gomez
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 74 |
| 🇵🇷 Gómez | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 314 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | GómezRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 174 | — |
| Knockouts | 109 | 42 |
| Unbeaten run | 91 | — |
| Middleweight titles | 5 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 2 | — |
| Consecutive title defences by knockout | — | 17 |
| World titles in weight classes | — | 3 |
| Professional wins | — | 44 |
| Title fights | — | 27 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 89.5 for Wilfredo Gómez — a gap of 4.8 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gómez does not lead any of the five categories; Robinson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 94.3, Gómez: 89.5.
Make your case for Robinson vs Gómez. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.