Who is better, Robinson or W. Klitschko?
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 93.1 for Wladimir Klitschko — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sugar Ray Robinson above Wladimir Klitschko: 94.3 vs 93.1. Sugar Ray Robinson leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Dominance, Longevity
W. Klitschko wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/sugar-ray-robinson-vs-wladimir-klitschko
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 74 |
| 🇺🇦 W. Klitschko | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 204 | 551 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | W. KlitschkoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 174 | — |
| Knockouts | 109 | 53 |
| Unbeaten run | 91 | — |
| Middleweight titles | 5 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 2 | — |
| World title fights | — | 29 |
| Title defences | — | 23 |
| Professional wins | — | 64 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteSugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 93.1 for Wladimir Klitschko — a gap of 1.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
W. Klitschko does not lead any of the five categories; Robinson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 94.3, W. Klitschko: 93.1.
Make your case for Robinson vs W. Klitschko. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.