Who is better, Robinson or Corbett?
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 88.0 for Young Corbett III — a gap of 6.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sugar Ray Robinson above Young Corbett III: 94.3 vs 88.0. Sugar Ray Robinson leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Corbett wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/sugar-ray-robinson-vs-young-corbett-iii
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 74 |
| 🇺🇸 Corbett | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 265 | 547 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | CorbettRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 174 | 126 |
| Knockouts | 109 | 34 |
| Unbeaten run | 91 | — |
| Middleweight titles | 5 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 2 | — |
| World titles in two divisions | — | 2 |
| Career bouts | — | 158 |
| Fighter of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 88.0 for Young Corbett III — a gap of 6.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Corbett does not lead any of the five categories; Robinson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 94.3, Corbett: 88.0.
Make your case for Robinson vs Corbett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.