Who is better, Robinson or Judah?
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 82.7 for Zab Judah — a gap of 11.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sugar Ray Robinson above Zab Judah: 94.3 vs 82.7. Sugar Ray Robinson leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Robinson wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Judah wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/sugar-ray-robinson-vs-zab-judah
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Robinson leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Robinson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 74 |
| 🇺🇸 Judah | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 20 | 33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RobinsonRetired | JudahRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 6 | — |
| Career wins | 174 | — |
| Knockouts | 109 | — |
| Unbeaten run | 91 | — |
| Middleweight titles | 5 | — |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | 2 | — |
| World titles in divisions | — | 2 |
| Undisputed titles | — | 1 |
| Professional wins | — | 44 |
| Career knockouts | — | 30 |
| Professional bouts | — | 55 |
| Dominance w25% | 95 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 86 |
Sugar Ray Robinson leads with a GOAT score of 94.3 against 82.7 for Zab Judah — a gap of 11.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Judah does not lead any of the five categories; Robinson is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Robinson: 94.3, Judah: 82.7.
Make your case for Robinson vs Judah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.