GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

O'Neill vs Smith

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
O'NeillWinner
85.5

O'Neill wins: Longevity

Smith
85.5

Smith wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/susie-oneill-vs-tatjana-smith

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Susie O'Neill
85.5

O'Neill leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic 200 m butterfly champion in 1996 and 200 m freestyle champion in 2000.

1. Susie O'Neill
85.5
2. Tatjana Smith
85.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇦🇺 Susie O'Neill5 seasons played · career day 1,825369 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇿🇦 Tatjana Smith5 seasons played · career day 1,82612 major golds
-96.7% vs O'Neill at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 O'Neill0055121369732
🇿🇦 Smith0013823

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricO'NeillRetiredSmithRetired
Olympic gold medals22
Olympic medals8
World Championship golds42
Commonwealth Games golds10
Australian titles35
Olympic silver medals2
World records2
Commonwealth golds4
Dominance w25%8486
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%8274
Honours w20%8686
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
O'Neill85.5
Smith85.5
The people
O'Neill
Smith

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for O'Neill vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →