Who is better, Kuznetsova or Renshaw?
William Renshaw leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for Svetlana Kuznetsova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks William Renshaw above Svetlana Kuznetsova: 82.4 vs 82.3. William Renshaw leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Svetlana Kuznetsova leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Renshaw wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Kuznetsova wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/svetlana-kuznetsova-vs-william-renshaw
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Renshaw leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Kuznetsova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| 🇬🇧 Renshaw | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 660 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KuznetsovaRetired | RenshawRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 2 | — |
| WTA titles | 18 | — |
| Fed Cup titles | 3 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 2 | — |
| Career match wins | 700 | — |
| Wimbledon singles titles | — | 7 |
| Consecutive Wimbledon titles | — | 6 |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | — | 5 |
| Major finals | — | 8 |
| Seasons on tour | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
William Renshaw leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for Svetlana Kuznetsova — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kuznetsova scores higher on statistics, longevity. Renshaw leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kuznetsova: 82.3, Renshaw: 82.4.
Make your case for Kuznetsova vs Renshaw. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.